MOBILE LEARNING: ATITUDE DE ESTUDANTES UNIVERSITÁRIOS NA APRENDIZAGEM DE LÍNGUA ESTRANGEIRA SOB A PERSPECTIVA ECOLÓGICA
Resumen
Citas
Abu-al-aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors Influencing Students ’ Acceptance of
M-Learning : An Investigation in Higher Education. The Internationla Review
of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 82–107.
Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., &
Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon Report Preview 2017 Higher
Education Edition. Austin, Texas. Retrieved from
http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2017-nmc-horizon-report-he-preview.pdf
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and Agency. Annual Review of Antropology, (30),
–137. Retrieved from
www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109?journalC
ode=anthro
Ahonen, T. (2013). Mobile and Megatrends. In M. Bruck, P. A.; Rao (Ed.), Global
Mobile Applications and innovations for the worldwide mobile ecosystem (pp.
–45). Medford: Informtion Today, Inc.
Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murphy, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J.,
McCormack, M., … Seilhamer, R. (2019). Horizon Report 2019. Luisville.
Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/horizonreport.
Amina, T. (2017). Active Knowledge Making Epistemic Dimensions of e-
Learning. In M. Cope, Bill; Kalantzis (Ed.), e-Learning Ecologies: Principles
for new learning and assessment (1st ed., pp. 65–87). Nova Iorque: Routledge
- Taylos & Francis Group.
Aronin, L., & Singleton, D. (2012). Affordances theory in multilingualism studies.
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 311.
https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.3.3
Austin, J. L. (1990). Quando dizer é fazer. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.
Banco Mundial. (2019). World Bank Open Data. Banco Mundial. Retrieved from
https://data.worldbank.org/
Baran, E. (2014). A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education.
Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 17–32.
Bates, T. (2017). Educar na era digital: design, ensino e aprendizegm (1st ed.). São
Paulo: Artesanato Educacional; ABED.
Bax, S. (2011). Normalisation Revisited: The Effective Use of Technology in
Language Education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language
Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2011040101
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Bergmann, J; Sams, A. (2012). Flipp Your Classroom: reach every student in every
class every day. International Society for Technonogy in Education.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic
account of designs for learning. Written Communication, (25), 166–195.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307313177
Blanken-Webb, J. (2017a). Collaborative Intelligence Social Dimensions of e-
Learning. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), e-Learning Ecologies: Principles
for new learning and assessment (1st ed., pp. 143–162). Nova Iorque:
Routledge - Taylos & Francis Group.
Blanken-Webb, J. (2017b). Metacognition Cognitive Dimensions of e-Learning. In
B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), e-Learning Ecologies: Principles for new
learning and assessment (1st ed., pp. 163–182). Nova: Routledge - Taylos &
Francis Group.
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt and Co.
Boticki, I., Baksa, J., Seow, P., & Looi, C.-K. (2015). Usage of a mobile social
learning platform with virtual badges in a primary school. Comput Educ, (86),
–136.
Braga, J. (2017). English language teaching on the wings of mobility: a study on
the affordances of mobile learning in classroom practice. In A. L. A. Marciotto
& J. Braga (Eds.), Inspiring insights from an English teaching scene (pp. 142–
. Belo Horizonte: FALE/UFMG.
Breen, M. P. (1984). Process syllabuses for the language classroom. In C. J. Brumfit
(Ed.), General English Syllabus Design (pp. 47–60). Londres: Pergamon Press
& The British Council.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it
done? Qualitative Research, 1(6), 97–113.
Burston, J. (2014). MALL : the pedagogical challenges MALL : the pedagogical
challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 344–357.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.914539
Cadierno, T; Lund, K. (2004). Cognitive linguistics and second language
acquisition: motion event in a typological framework. In S. VanPattern, B.;
Williams, J.; Root (Ed.), Form-meaning connections in second language
acquisition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012). Complex systems and applied
linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x
Campoy, T. J. (2018). Metodología de la investigación científica: manual para
elaborción de tésis y trabajos de investigación. Asunción: Marben.
Canale, M. (2013). From communicative competence to communicative language
pedagogy. In R. Richards, J. C.; Schmidt (Ed.), Language and communication
(pp. 01–27). Londres: Taylos & Francis.
Casey, L., & Bruce, B. C. (2011). The practice profile of inquiry: Connecting digital
literacy and pedagogy. E-Learning and Digital Media, 1(8), 76–85.
Chan, T.-W. (2010). How East Asian classrooms may change over the next 20
years. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 28–52.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00342.x
Chan, T.-W. (2015). Removing Seams by Linking and Blurring How We Came Up
with Seamless Learning. In M. Wong, L. H.; Milrad, M.; SPECHT (Ed.),
Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile Connectivity (1a ed., pp. v–xv).
London: Springer.
Chan, T.-W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., … Hoppe,
U. (2006). One-To-One Technology-Enhanced Learning: an Opportunity for
Global Research Collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology
Enhanced Learning, 01(01), 3–29.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793206806000032
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer application in second language acquisition:
foudations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Chapelle, C. A. (2014). Afterword: Technology-mediated TBLT and the evolving
role of the innovator. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technologymediated
TBLT : Researching technology and tasks (pp. 323–334).
Philadelfia: John Benjamins North America.
Chizzottí, A. (2014). Pesquisa em ciências humanas e sociais. São Paulo: Editora
Cortez.
Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner`s Verbal Behavior. Language
Learning, (35), 26–58.
Chwo, G. S. M., Marek, M. W., & Wu, W. C. V. (2018). Meta-analysis of MALL
research and design. System, 74(1018), 62–72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.02.009
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education.
Nova Iorque: Routledge.
Conselho da Europa. (2001a). Quadro Europeu Comum de Referência para as
Línguas: aprendiagem, ensino e avaliação. Lisboa. Retrieved from
http://www.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/Basico/Documentos/quadro_europe
u_comum_referencia.pdf
Conselho da Europa. (2001b). Tornar o espaço europeu de aprendizagem ao longo
da vida uma realidade. Bruxelas.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). Ubiquitous learning: An agenda for educational
transformation. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Ubiquitous learning (pp.
–14). Cgampagne: University of Illinois.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2017). Conceptualizing e-Learning. In M. Cope, Bill;
Kalantzis (Ed.), e-Learning Ecologies: Principles for new learning and
assessment (1st ed., pp. 1–47). Nova Iorque: Routledge - Taylos & Francis
Group.
Costa, Gilsenda dos Santos, & Xavier, A. C. (2014). Aprendizagem formal , nãoformal
e informal com a tecnologia móvel : um processo rizomático. III
Congresso Internacional TIC e Educação. Lisboa. Retrieved from
http://ticeduca2014.ie.ul.pt/index.php/pt/
Costa, Giselda dos Santos. (2013). Mobile Learning: Explorando potencialidades
com o uso do celular no ensino-aprendizagem de língua inglesa como língua
estrangeira com alunos da escola pública. Universidade Federal de
Pernanbuco.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
methods (4th ed.). Thousands Oaks: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Tashakkori, A. (2007). Differing perspectives on mixed research
methods. Journal of Mixed Research Methods, vol 1((4),), 303–308.
Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning. In Z. L. Berge &
L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (1a ed., pp. 3–14). New
York: Routledge.
De Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic
process. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 166–178.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00712.x
Doughty, C.; Long, M. (2005). The scope of Inquiry and goals os SLA. In M.
Doughty, C.; Long (Ed.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition.
Blackwell Publishing.
Doughty, C. (2000). La negociación del entorno linguístico de la L2. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Segundas Lenguas. Adquisición en el aula (pp. 163–194). Ariel Lingüística.
Dunn, D. S., Wilson, J. H., & Freeman, J. E. (2011). Approach or Avoidance?
Understanding Technology’s Place in Teaching and Learning. In F. R. S. Dana
S. Dunn, Janie H Wilsom, James E. Freeman (Ed.), Best Practices for
Technology-Enhanced Teaching and Learning (1a ed., pp. 17–34). New York:
Oxford Publish Press. Retrieved from www.oup.com
Ellis, N. (2005). Constructions, chunking and connectionism: the emergence of
second language structure. In M. Doughty, C.; Long (Ed.), The Handbook of
Second Language Acquisition. Blackwell Publishing.
Ellis, N. (2006). Cognitive Perspectives on SLA: The associative-cognitivie
CRRED. AILA Review, (19), 100–121.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Ellis, Rod. (2005). Planning and task-based research: Theory and research. In Rod
Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task-performance in a second language (Vol. 1, pp.
–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Falloon, G. (2015). What’s the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in
conventional classrooms. Comput Educ, (84), 62–77.
Fischer, B. A. (1987). Interpersonal communication: pragmatics of human
relationships. Nova Iorque: Random House.
Fishman, B.; Dede, C. (2016). Teaching and Technology: New Tools for New
Times. In C. A. Gitomer, D. H.; Bell (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching
(5th ed., pp. 1269–1334). Washington: American Educational Research
Association.
Floyd, D., & Portnow, J. (2008). Brain Training. Daniel Floyd. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rN0qRKjfX3s
Foomani, E. M., & Hedayati, M. (2016). A Seamless Learning Design for Mobile
Assisted Language Learning: An Iranian Context. English Language
Teaching, 9(5), 206. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p206
Franklin, K. R., & Gibson, K. (2014). Translating traditional writing process tools
to digital ones: Integrating digital writing in K-12 classrooms. In R. S.
Anderson & C. Mims (Eds.), Handbook of research on digital tools for writing
instruction in K–12 settings (pp. 386–400). Hershey: IGI Global.
Freire, P. (1994). A pedagogia do oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L., & Wager, W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design.
Fort Worth, TX (4th ed.). Philadelfia: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Retrieved
from
https://scholar.google.com.my/scholar?q=Gagné%2C+R.+M.%2C+Briggs%
C+L.+J.%2C+%26+Wager%2C+W.+W.+%281992%29&btnG=&hl=en&a
s_sdt=0%2C5#1
García, M.; Álvarez, F. (n.d.). Métodos y enfoques en la enseñanza de español como
lengua extranjera. Alcalá.
Gardner, R.; Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language
learning. Boston: Newbury House.
Gass, S.; Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: an introdutory course.
New York: Taylos & Francis.
Gass, S. (2005). Input and interaction. In M. Doughty, C.; Long (Ed.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Blackwell Publishing.
Gee, J. P. (2013). The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice.
Champaign: Common Ground.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. NJ: Erlbaum.
Gillies, C. G. M. K. (2016). To BYOD or not to BYOD: Factors affecting academic
acceptance of student mobile devices in the classroom. Research in Learning
Technology, 24(June). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.30357
Gómez, J. (n.d.). Adquisición de lenguas segundas y extranjeras. Alcalá.
Gonulal, T. (2019). The development and validation of an attitude towards MALL
instrument. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 733–
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09663-6
González-Lloret, M. (2017). Technology for Task ‐ based Language Teaching. In
Carol A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The Handbook of technology and Second
Language Teaching and Learning (1st ed., pp. 234–247). Oxford: John Wiley
& Sons, Inc.
González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (2014). Towards technology-mediated TBLT:
An introduction. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Task-Based
Language Teaching: Issues, Research and Practice (TBLT) (pp. 1–22).
Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Guilloteaux, M. J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating Language Learners : A
classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on
student motivation. TESOL QUARTERLY, 42(1), 55–78.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. (E. Arnold,
Ed.). Londres.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An Introduction to function grammar. Londres: Hodder
Arnold.
Haniya, S., & Roberts-lieb, S. (2017). Differentiated Learning Diversity
Dimensions of e-Learning. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), e-Learning
Ecologies: Principles for new learning and assessment (1st ed., pp. 183–206).
Nova Iorque: Routledge - Taylos & Francis Group.
Haniya, S., & Rusch, A. (2017). Ubiquitous Learning Spatio-Temporal Dimensions
of e-Learning. In M. Cope, Bill; Kalantzis (Ed.), e-Learning Ecologies:
Principles for new learning and assessment (1st ed., pp. 46–64). Nova Iorque:
Routledge - Taylos & Francis Group.
Hernández, R. S., Fernández-Callado, C., & Baptista, P. L. (2008). Metodología de
la Investigación (4th ed.). México D.F.: McGraw Hill.
Hiew, F. C., & Chew, E. (2016). Seams remain in seamless learning. On the
Horizon, 24(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-09-2015-0063
Hirumi, A. (2013). Aplicando estratégias fundamentadas para projetar e sequenciar
interações em e-learning. Revista Da Associação Brasileira de Tecnologia
Educacional, 6–41.
Houaiss, A. (2001). Dicionário Houaiss da Língua Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro:
Objetiva.
Howatt, A. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Yang, S. J. H. (2008). Criteria, strategies and research
issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Educational Technology and
Society, 11(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/978-0-387-70892-8
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride, J. B.; Holmes (Ed.),
Sociolinguistics: selected reading (pp. 269–293). Londres: Penguin Books.
Johnson, K. (1982). Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Londres:
Pergamon Press.
Juarez, L. J. (2015). Task based learning: a complex perspective. Revista
Desempenho, 1(23).
Karatas, H., Alci, B., Bademcioglu, M., & Ergin, A. (2016). Examining University
Students ’ Attitudes towards Learning English Using Different Variables. The
International Kournal of Educational Researchers, 7(2), 12–20.
Kemper, E. A., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methods sampling
strategies in social science research. In A. Tashakori & C. Teddlie (Eds.),
Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. Thousand
Oaks: Sage.
Krashen, S. (1977). The Monitor model for adult second language performance. In
Viewpoints of english as a second language (pp. 152–161). New York:
Regents.
Krashen, S. (1978). The Monitor model for second language acquisition. In R. C.
Gingras (Ed.), Second Langage Acquisition & Foreign Language Teaching
(pp. 1–26). Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning.
Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input hypothesis: issues and implications. Londres:
Longman Group.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media
of contemporary communication. Londres: Arnold.
Krosnick, J. A., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2005). The Measurement of
Attitudes. In The handbook of attitudes. (pp. 21–76). Mahwah, NJ, US:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Kuh, G. D. (1996a). Guiding Principles for Creating Seamless Learning
Environments for Undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development,
, 135–148.
Kuh, G. D. (1996b). Some Things We Should Forget. About Campus, 1(4), 10–11.
Retrieved from
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ548700
&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2015). Language as a bridge connecting formal and informal
language learning through mobile devices. In L. H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M.
Spetch (Eds.), Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile Connectivity (pp. 281–
. Sinagapore: Spri. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-113-8_14
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Lee, H., & Norris, L. (2017). Mobile Learning Revolution:
Implications for Language Pedagogy. In S. Chapelle, C. A; Sauro (Ed.), The
Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning (1st
ed., pp. 217–233). Oxford: Wiley Blacwell.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069.ch15
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Norris, L., & Donohue, J. (2015). Mobile pedagogy for a
guide for teachers. ELT Research Papers (Vol. 14). Londres: British Council
/ Open University.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018). Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 207–218.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12580
Kumaravadevelu, B. (2006a). Tesol Methods: changing tracks, challenging trends.
TESOL, 40(1), 59–81.
Kumaravadevelu, B. (2006b). Understanding language teaching: from method to
postmethod. Londres: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language
Learning. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in Second Language
Acquisition (pp. 197–221). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Larsen-Freeman, D; Long, M. (2014). An introduction to second language
research. Nova Iorque: Taylos & Francis.
Larsen-Freeman, D.; Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language
teaching. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-freeman, D. (1997). Chaos / Complexity Science and Second Language
Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141
Larsen-freeman, D. (2011). A complexity theory approach to second language
development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to
second language acquisition. London: Routledge - Taylos & Francis Group.
Larsen-freeman, D. (2017). Complexity Theory The lessons continue. In L. Ortega
& Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity Theory and Language Development (pp. 11–50).
Msterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos /
complexity theory perspective. In Claire Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition
and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 33–46). Londres:
Continuum.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning participation (1a ed.). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Lohr, L. (2008). Creating graphics for learning and performance: lessons in visiual
literacy (2nd ed.). Upper Side River: Pearson Education.
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistics environment in second language
acquisition. In T. Ritchie, W.; Bathia (Ed.), Handbook of second language
acquisition (pp. 413–468). Nova Iorque: Academic Press.
Looi, C.-K., Sun, D., Wu, L., Seow, P., Chia, G., & Wong, L.-H. (2014).
Implementing mobile learning curricula in a grade level: empirical study of
learning effectiveness at scale. Comput Educ, (77), 101–115.
Looi, C. K., Seow, P., Zhang, B., So, H. J., Chen, W., & Wong, L. H. (2010).
Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research
agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 154–169.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00912.x
Lopes Jr, J., Leffa, V., Nunes, G., & Oliveira, V. O. (2017). Aprendizagem baseada
em tarefas e o desenvolvimento da língua inglesa como segunda língua :
Análises a partir da Perspectiva Ecológica . Entretextos, 17(2), 175–194.
Marconi, M. de A., & Lakatos, E. M. (2010). Fundamentos da metodologia
científica (7th ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Mattar, J; Czeszak, W. (2013). Avaliação em Educação a Distância. In T. A. Faria,
Evangelina Maria Brito de; Souza, Hercilio de Medeiros; Fernandes (Ed.),
Educação a distância: textos aplicados a situações práticas (pp. 73–98). João Pessoa: Univrsidade Federal da Paraíba.
Mattar, J. (2014a). Design Educacional: educação a distância na prática. São
Paulo: Artesanato Educacional.
Mattar, J. (2014b). Interações em ambientes virtuais de aprendizagem: histórico e
modelo. TECCOGS Revista Digital de Tecnologias Cognitivas, 9, 53–71.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press (2nd ed.).
New York: Cambridge University Press.
McLaughlin. (1990). “Conscious” versus “Unconscious” learning. TESOL, 24(04),
–634.
Menezes, A. M. (2011). Metodologia utilizada nos artigos de revisão. Jornal
Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 37(4), Anexo. Retrieved from
https://goo.gl/4VHCep
Menezes, V. (2011). Affordances for Language Learning Beyond the Classroom.
In P. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the Language Classroom (pp. 59–
. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306790_6
Mioduser, D.; Nachmias, R.; Oren, A.; Lahav, O. (1999). Web-based learning
environments (WBLES): current implementation and envolving trends.
Journal of Network and Computer Applications, (22), 233–247.
Moore, M. (2014). Três tipos de interação. Revista Digital de Tecnologias
Cognitivas, 9, 73–80.
Moran, J. (2014). Novos modelos de sala de aula. Educatrix: Editora Moderna No.
, 33–37. Retrieved from
https://www.moderna.com.br/educatrix/home_ed7.html#
Murray, G. (2011). Metacognition and Imagination in Self-Access Language
Learning. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp.
–18). Gaziantep: Zirve University.
Naismith, L.; Lonsdale, P.; Vavoula, G.; Sharples, M. (2004). Literature review in
mobile tecnology and learning. NESTA Future Lab. Bristol.
Newman, I., Ridenour, C., Newman, C., & Paul de Marco, G. (2003). A typology
of research porposes and its relationship to mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori
& C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral
research (pp. 167–188). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Nicholas, H. &, & Ng, W. (2015). Seamless Learning in Its Pedagogy. In L.-H.
Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile
Connectivity (1a ed., pp. 261–280). Singapore: Springer Singapore. Retrieved
from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-287-113-8
Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: making it work. ELT
Journal, (41), 136–145.
O`Malley, C. O., Vavoula, G., Glew, J. P., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., Lonsdale, P.,
… Sharples, M. (2005). Guidelines for learning / teaching / tutoring in a
mobile environment. Public deliverable from the MOBILearn project.
Ossiannilsson, E., & Ioannides, N. (2017). Toward a framework and learning
methodology for innovative mobile learning: A theoretical approach.
Handbook of Research on Digital Content, Mobile Learning, and Technology
Integration Models in Teacher Education, 266–286.
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2953-8.ch014
Oz, H., Demirezen, M., & Pourfeiz, J. (2015). Emotional Intelligence and Attitudes Towards Foreign Language Learning: Pursuit of Relevance and Implications.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 416–423.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.118
Ozdamli, F. (2013). Effectiveness of cloud systems and social networks in
improving self-directed learning abilities and developing positive seamless
learning perceptions. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(5), 602–619.
Pacheco, F. (2002). Actitudes. Eúphoros, 5(1), 173–186.
Paiva, V. L. M. O. (2014). Aquisição de segunda língua. São Paulo: Parábola
Editorial.
Panitz, T. (1999). Collaborative versus cooperative learning: A comparison of the
two concepts which will help us undestand the underlying nature of interactive
learning. ERIC Database.
Parson, D., & Ryu, H. (2006). A framework for assessing the quality of mobile
learning. In G. Dawson, E.; Georgiadou, E.; Lincar, P.; Ross, M.; Staples
(Ed.), Learning and Teaching Issues in Software Quality (pp. 17–27).
Proceeding of the 11th International Conference for Process Improvment,
Research ans Education.
Parsons, D., Thomas, H., & Wishart, J. (2016). Exploring mobile affordances in the
digital classroom. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile
Learning 2016, 43–50.
Pegrum, M. (2014). Mobile learning: Languages, literacies and cultures. (M.
Pegrum, Ed.). Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Portnow, J. (2008). The Power of Tangential Learning. Edge, 3–4. Retrieved from
http://www.edge-online.com/blogs/the-power-tangential-learning
Primo, A. (2000). Interação mútua e interação reativa: uma proposta de estudo.
Revista Da Famecos, (12), 81–92.
Puentedura, R. (2012). Building upon SAMR. Perth: Presented at Presbyterian
Ladies`College.
Rath, R. (2015). Game Criticism as Tangential Learning Facilitator : The Case of
Critical Intel. Journal of Games Criticism, 2(1), 1–9. Retrieved from
http://www.gamescriticism.org
Reid, D., & Pechenkina, E. (2016). Bring-Your-Own-Device or Prescribed Mobile
Technology? Investigating Student Device Preferences for Mobile Learning.
Mobile Learning Futures – Sustaining Quality Research and Practice in
Mobile Learning, (October), 399.
Reinders, H., & Pegrum, M. (2017). Supporting language learning on the move: An
evaluative framework for mobile language learning resources. In B.
Tomlinson (Ed.), SLA research and materials development for language
learning (pp. 219–231). Nova Iorque: Routledge.
Renwick, M. (2017). Digital Portfolios in the classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.
Richards, J. C.; Rodgers, T. S. (1999). Approaches and methods in language
teaching. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press.
Romiszowski, A; Romiszowski, L. (2005). Retrospectiva e perspectiva do Design
Instrucional e educação a distância: análise da literatura. Revista Brasileira de
Aprendizagem Aberta e a Distância, 4.
Royle, K., Stager, S., & Traxler, J. (2014). Teacher development with mobiles: Comparative critical factors. Prospects, 44(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9292-8
Rumelhart, D. E.; McClelland, J. J. (1987). Learning the past tenses of English
verbs: implicit rules or parallel distribted processing? In B. MacWhinney
(Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 195–248). Hillsdale:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rumelhart, D. E.; Smolensky, P.; MacClelland, J. L.; Hinton, G. E. (1986).
Schemata and sequential Thought processes in PDP models. In J. L.
Rumelhart, D. E.; MacClelland (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing:
explorig in the microstrcture of cognition (pp. 8–57). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rutledge, P. B. (2013). The psychology of mobile technologies. In M. Bruck, P. A.;
Rao (Ed.), Global Mobile Applications and innovations for the worldwide
mobile ecosystem (pp. 47–71). Medford: Informtion Today, Inc.
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in secondo language learning.
Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.
Schumann, J. H. (1976). Second Language Acquisition: the pidginization
hypothesis. Language Learning, 26(2), 391–408.
Schumann, J. H. (1978). Tha acculturation model for second language acquisition.
In R. C. Gingras (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition & Foreign language
teaching (pp. 27–50). Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Schwardt, T. A. (2007). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.).
Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
Sharples, M., Adams, A., Alonzie, N., Fergusen, R., FitzGerald, E., Gaved, M., …
Yarnell, L. (2014). Innovating Pedagogy 2014: Open University Innovation
Report 3. Innovating Pedagogy 2015: Open University Innovation Report 4
(Vol. 4). London.
Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sanchéz, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. N. (2009). Mobile
Learning:Smal Devices, Big Issues. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. De Jong,
A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-Enhanced Learning: Principles
and Products (pp. 233–249). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7
Sharples, M., Scanlon, E., Ainsworth, S., Anastopoulou, S., Collins, T., & Crook,
C. (2015). Personal inquiry: orchestrating science in- vestigations within and
beyond the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(24), 308–341.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Smith, A., & Kennett, K. (2017). Multimodal Meaning Discursive Dimensions of
e-Learning. In M. Cope, Bill; Kalantzis (Ed.), e-Learning Ecologies:
Principles for new learning and assessment (1st ed., pp. 88–117). Nova
Iorque: Routledge - Taylos & Francis Group.
Smith, A., McCarthey, S., & Magnifico, A. (2017). Recursive feedback: Evaluative
dimensions of e-Learning. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), e-Learning
ecologies: Principles for new learning and assessment (1st ed., pp. 118–142).
Nova Iorque: Routledge - Taylos & Francis Group.
SMS Service Team. (2011). Digital Portfolios - Guidelines for beginners.
Wellington.
Song, Y. (2013). Developing a framework for examining the “niche” for mobileassisted
seamless learning from an ecological perspective. British Journal of
Educational Technology, 44(5), 167–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12069
Song, Y., & Kong, C. S. (2016). Affordances and constraints of BYOD (Bring Your
Own Device) for learning and teaching in higher education: Teachers’
perspectives. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 39–46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.004
Song, Y., & Ma, C. L. A. (2013). Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) for seamless
science inquiry: A case study in a primary school. Proceedings of the 21st
International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2013, 886–895.
Song, Y., & Wen, Y. (2018). Integrating Various Apps on BYOD (Bring Your Own
Device) into Seamless Inquiry-Based Learning to Enhance Primary Students’
Science Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(2), 165–
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9715-z
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible
input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden
(Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley: Newbury
House.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2008). Foundations of mixed methods research (1st
ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Tibaud, X. V. (2009). Las actitudes de profesores y estudiantes, y la influencia de
factores de aula en la transmisión de la naturaleza de la ciencia en la
enseñanza secundaria. Universidad de Barcelona.
Traxler, J. (2009). The Evolution of Mobile Learning. (R. Guy, Ed.). Santa Rora:
Informing Science Press. Retrieved from
http://books.google.com/books?id=Cz5SCEaHNAMC&pg=PA15&source=g
bs_toc_r&cad=4#v=twopage&q&f=true
UNESCO. (2014). Diretrizes de políticas para a aprendizagem móvel.
Urbieta, R. R. de, & Wexell-Machado, L. E. (2018). Enseñanza de portugués lengua
extranjera. Revista Científica de la UCSA. Retrieved from
https://goo.gl/V5Fehx
van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: social interactive learning from an
ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocutural theory and second
language learning: recent advances (pp. 245–259). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
van Lier, L. (2002a). An ecological-semiotic perspective on language and
linguistics. In C Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language
socialization: ecological perspectives (pp. 140–164). Londres: Continuum.
van Lier, L. (2002b). An ecological-semiotic perspective on language and
linguistics. In Claire Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language
socialization: ecological perspectives (pp. 140–172). Bath: Continuum.
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: a
Sociocultural Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Walliman, N. (2011). Research Methods: The Basics. Research Methods: The
Basics. Nova Iorque: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203836071
Wenger, E. (1987). Aritificial Intelligence and intelligent tutoring systems:
computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge
(1a ed.). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Wexell-Machado, L. E. (2016). O uso do desenho de aprendizagem 7Cs e da
Plataforma Moodle no ensino de português como língua estrangeira.
InterLetras. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/9ci5Wa
Wexell-Machado, L. E. (2017a). Aprendizagem de Português como Língua
Estrangeira com uso do Facebook e sob a orientação de Comunidades de
Busca do Conhecimento. Revista X. https://doi.org/10.5380/rvx.v12i2.49251
Wexell-Machado, L. E. (2017b). Aprendizagem Tangencial. Revista EducaOnline.
Retrieved from https://goo.gl/6LY1Qe
Wexell-Machado, L. E., Alcaraz, L., & Beníte, I. (2019). Relatos de experiências
de ex-estudantes de português língua estrangeira: a coconstrução do
conhecimento por meio da pesquisa narrativa. Revista EntreLinguas, 5(1), 39–
https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v5i1.12599
Wexell-Machado, L. E., & Urbieta, R. R. de. (2016). Mejora de la efectividad de
los materiales didácticos para la enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras.
ACADEMO. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/9zW8Um
Wexell-Machado, L. E., & Urbieta, R. R. de. (2017). Materiales didácticos para la
enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras. In II Encuentro de investigadores:
construyendo el conocimiento científico en Paraguay. PY. Retrieved from
https://goo.gl/HmDWyN
Wexell-Machado, Luis Eduardo, & Urbieta, R. R. de. (2019). Uso de celular por
parte de estudantes de português língua estrangeira na elaboração de tarefas
acadêmicas. REVISTA ÑEMITỸRÃ, I(1), 115–130.
William, N. K. (2009). Task-Based Language Teaching and Complexity Theory.
Nanzan Junior College Journal, 12(37), 85–105.
Withagen, R., & Chemero, A. (2012). Affordances and classification: On the
significance of a sidebar in James Gibson’s last book. Philosophical
Psychology, 25(4), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.579424
Wong, L.-H. (2012). A learner-centric view of mobile seamless learning. British
Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), E19–E23.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01245.x
Wong, L.-H. (2013). Analysis of students’ after-school mobile-assisted artifact
creation processes in a seamless language learning environment. Educational
Technology and Society, 16(2), 198–211.
Wong, L.-H., Chai, C. S., & Aw, G. P. (2015). What seams do we remove in
learning a language? – Towards a seamless language learning framework. In
L. H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless Learning in the Age of
Mobile Connectivity (1st ed., pp. 295–318). Singapore: Springer.
Wong, L. H. (2015). A Brief History of Mobile Seamless Learning. In L.-H. Wong,
M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile
Connectivity (1st ed., pp. 3–40). Singapore: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-113-8
Wong, L. H., Chai, C. S., & Aw, G. P. (2017). Seamless language learning: Second
language learning with social media. Comunicar, 25(50), 9–20.
https://doi.org/10.3916/C50-2017-01
Wong, L. H., Chen, W., & Jan, M. (2012). How artefacts mediate small-group cocreation
activities in a mobile-assisted seamless language learning
environment? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 411–424.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00445.x
Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted
seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers and
Education, 57(4), 2364–2381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.007
Yu, S., & Yang, X. (2015). A Resource Organization Model for Ubiquitous
Learning in a Seamless Learning Space. In L. H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M.
Specht (Eds.), Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile Connectivity (1st ed.,
pp. 141–158). Sinagapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-
-8
Zhang, M. (2016). Teaching with Google Classroom. Birmingham: Packt
Publishing.
Zhao, L. (2015). The Influence of Learners’ Motivation and Attitudes on Second
Language Teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(11), 2333.
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0511.18
Refbacks
- No hay Refbacks actualmente.